I need a good analogy

[WildWestDesigns]

This is all because of shows like CSI with people sitting behind computer monitors saying, "Zoom in. Enhance. Enhance. Enhance." That's not how it works, it's not magic.

It also doesn't help that you have software vendors hocking features that allow for cleanup of crappy images with just a few clicks of the button.

Consider y'all lucky though. Atleast when y'all get a good respectable vector, the sky opens up and the angels sing. I get a good respectable vector, there is still a chance that it won't work with production, because the design isn't taking into account physical production (outside of print/web "production").

Imagine trying to tell people that their pristine vector logo will still translate like crap.

 

[The Vector Doctor]

Look what just arrived. Much clearer. There is no way I could have guessed what the g looked like if I had to somehow work from the first version

 

[bannertime]

Look what just arrived. Much clearer. There is no way I could have guessed what the g looked like if I had to somehow work from the first version

Wow! So do a recreation of both art. Then when someone says it should be fine, show them how much of a difference there is between to two final pieces.

 

[DerbyCitySignGuy]

Wow! So do a recreation of both art. Then when someone says it should be fine, show them how much of a difference there is between to two final pieces.

Then he's spending his own time and resources when he should just be able to say, "Hey, this is the way it is."

Probably wouldn't be a bad idea to have a sample (kind of like the one in this thread) to show to customers if they make a big stink about getting good (or even reasonable) files. You only have to do that one time!

 

[The Vector Doctor]

I have done so a few times. Here are some examples

The Vector Doctor

The Vector Doctor

The Vector Doctor

 

[Johnny Best]

Good examples Doc.

 

[Oroscoe]

CRAP in...........CRAP out!