My two cents...
From an objective view point: It's 'fine'. There is nothing wrong with it in the way that it's been presented. It's simple and clean.
From a personal point of view: It's kind generic. It looks like a logo that I would print and forget about, almost temporary if that makes sense. The 'graphics' font for me it a little to stylized and you might have issues reading it from a distance. Maybe perhaps a Bank Gothic font with some slightly exaggerated kerning. I would like to see what it looks like on white as well.
I like the solid bar on JB that rick did. For me it does seem to flow more.
What type of 'graphics' are you getting into?
What does the JBM mean?
From an objective view point: It's 'fine'. There is nothing wrong with it in the way that it's been presented. It's simple and clean.
From a personal point of view: It's kind generic. It looks like a logo that I would print and forget about, almost temporary if that makes sense. The 'graphics' font for me it a little to stylized and you might have issues reading it from a distance. Maybe perhaps a Bank Gothic font with some slightly exaggerated kerning. I would like to see what it looks like on white as well.
I like the solid bar on JB that rick did. For me it does seem to flow more.
What type of 'graphics' are you getting into?
What does the JBM mean?