myront said:
Many "schooled" designers don't see sign designers as "real" Graphic Designers. We often get sign requests from the Graphic Design Instructor from a college. Very rarely are their files "ready to go". I just keep my mouth shut and press on....
I've seen the syndrome go both ways. I've seen people who've taken design classes or even earned art degrees who don't have any real talent. And I've seen people with no formal training produce really good work. Likewise there's plenty of designers who did get formal training or degrees who are clearly great at graphic design, illustration, etc. And there's no shortage of self taught designers working in our industry who really do suck at design. Being able to point and click around in a graphics problem is never enough to qualify anyone as being a real graphic designer.
I'm one of those odd dudes working in the sign industry that does have an art degree (from a reputable school too). I've been doing this stuff for a long time. I usually treat other designers I work with directly with at least some mutual respect, especially when they're people who I've seen produce good quality work. I don't care if they have a degree or any formal training at all. The quality of their work speaks for itself. Any "real" graphic designer is going to be a willing student of the craft, trying to learn, improve and grow, regardless of whether he is paying tuition to some college or just trying to learn on his own.
On the other hand I'm pretty merciless when it comes to garbage quality sign design. It's not too difficult to tell when someone was just
phoning it in on a project. One of my biggest pet peeves is seeing default Arial stretched and squeezed to fill a given space. Whenever I see that I automatically figure the person who "designed" that absolutely does not give a s*** about good design. There's a long list of other garbage I routinely see in sign layouts.
I get pretty heated about bad sign design these days because I feel like our industry is under a serious growing threat of sweeping anti-signs ordinances. It's impossible to legislate good taste or make it so only people with actual talent can do design work at sign companies. So, instead, communities (many of them upper income locations) are "cleaning up" their civic landscapes by banning whole categories of signs and putting suffocating limits on the few types of signs they're still willing to let businesses install. I feel the sign industry has to start making at least some kind of effort to police itself. I worry that if we don't do that and continue doing business as usual these anti-signs ordinances will spread and make times very tough for our businesses.
A sign designer has a certain level of civic responsibility to not take a visual dump on the local landscape. It's not a big deal if some hack badly designs a printed flyer or the banner ad on some web page. That stuff is very temporary. Signs can stand next to a road literally for decades. I don't expect a sign to be some miraculous, virtuoso piece of artwork, but I don't think I'm asking too much for the designs to be clean, balanced and competent. Unfortunately not nearly enough people doing design work at sign companies know how to do that.
kcollinsdesign said:
Replicating art files can be tedious. Sometimes you have to replicate what are obviously design errors on the original. Sometimes, I offer to "correct" the art, but it will always be in service of the final project.
Some of what I see is just bad, amateur design. Then there's other instances where it's a matter of one graphics application not being able to accurately import artwork made in a different application. That's why I've used CorelDRAW and Illustrator in parallel with each other for many years. And then there's the matter of people generating PDFs from applications like Illustrator
and doing it very very wrong. If it's obvious to me the PDF was generated from Adobe Illustrator I'll have no hesitation at all about asking the client for the unadulterated AI file. I give them a choice with the request. They can either provide me with clean artwork or they can pay design fees for the time it takes to clean up the tangle of clipping groups, "non native art" fills, duplicate objects and all sorts of other trash that result when generating a bad PDF.
kcollinsdesign said:
As far as font data embedded in the file format, it is converted to curves and becomes part of the image file needed to fabricate the product. This has been possible for years, and presents no real obstacle.
Embedded fonts in PDFs
usually aren't much of a hassle at all. I run into far worse problems when fonts aren't converted to outlines in other file formats, like EPS. Microsoft Publisher files are an adventure to try to import. An ancient CorelDRAW file with active text on path lettering or other effects may open in unpredictable ways in an up to date version of the program,
even if you have the same fonts that were used in the design. In all my Corel-based sign designs I've long had the habit of "finalizing" my text by converting it all to curves once I'm done editing it.