CheapVehicleWrap
New Member
Darn its registered. Http://Boycott3M.com lol. I do like their No3M logo though. ONLY 3 likes on facebook for 3m original wraps? Folks deserve a choice so I've linked to http://OriginalWraps.com on my site.
3M dictates the pricing you will have to charge and the installer is also responsible for any warranty issues. Maybe if I was an isntaller only it would benefit me? At the moment I'm losing key customers due to their stupid program that gives them an ultimatum.
. #m and all the large companies have been doing things like this while most of you were just thought in your parents plans!
This is only stupid in the shops that are loosing jobs to them. If it wasn't beneficial to your customer's they would continue to use you! It must be better for them to get the wrap through the leasing company and writing it off along with the cost of the vehicle. Like I said earlier they said years ago for wrap shops to get to the car leasing companies and talk to them and it appears most didn't and are now crying the blues because 3M saw the benefits of doing this and put the idea into a viable system for the businesses that lease and get their vehicles wrapped.
Who knows after you guys (if you do) get Oracle or any of the other manufactures products well known maybe they will do something similar and you will be crying the blues all over again. Why you do not put more effort into getting either the dealerships or leasing companies to use your local companies is beyond me. Letting 3M know in an open forum what your plans are just doesn't make sense to me being they can counter what you are doing 10 fold over. So good luck with your plans. #m and all the large companies have been doing things like this while most of you were just thought in your parents plans!
Colorado I choose not to do vehicle wraps from the get go, I do signs! So you are saying 3M is the one not letting you do the work or is it the leasing company? From people I have talked to that have had the same thing done to them it was the leasing company. So which one is it? I know 3M has some good lawyers that most likely wrote the contracts but the leasing companies didn't have to sign them unless it was beneficial to them. I know some small bank presidents in my area that have deals with the dealers for leasing using them over the large banks. So like I said maybe rather than complaining on here every couple of months you should approach some of the local banks and dealerships and see what that gets you, and if you do not like what 3M is doing use a different product.
money talks, 3M has more than me. I can't offer the prices they do. Don't you get it? How much do i have to dumb it down for you. I can't compete with what they're offering.
Colorado...
Truth in numbers... Let's post and share to the world and wait until a stockholder sees it...
What's so different about what they're doing and what Avery did? Please tell me. They both lied and denied any knowledge of what is going on. They're taking you, me and everyone else for a fool, and trying to pull the wool over our eyes so we can't see what they're doing.
Please don't imply for a second that what 3M is doing rises to the level of what Avery did.
Avery
3M
- Produced faulty high performance cast product that failed within a couple of months of installation requiring its replacement along with any other vinyl that touched it.
- These failures were widespread and were reported in the thousands. Yet these reported failures were only a small portion of the actual failures. Every known failure required additional time and materials for the sign company to remedy. Every failure including the unreported ones damaged the reputations of the sign companies that produced them and cost them countless lost clients and future sales revenue.
- Avery dismissed the failures as incorrect installation techniques and denied that they had manufactured defective product.
- Avery allowed the continued sale of defective product while they corrected the manufacturing problem.
- Avery avoided a class action product liability lawsuit by utilizing a divide and conquer approach to make minimal settlements through their distributors with all who actually complained on an individual basis.
- To the best of my knowledge, Avery has never admitted to any wrongdoing or even apologized to its loyal customers.
Avery's acts, IMHO, rose to the level of civil if not criminal liability. 3M's acts amount to pursuing a business model that impacts on independent wrap producers negatively and which are possibly in violation of U.S. anti-monopoly laws. Those who feel that this is the case can and should pursue responses such as public complaint, boycotting or legal action.
- 3M has setup a major program to provide a significant improvement, from the buyer's perspective as well as the vehicle manufacturers and dealers, in the marketing and fulfillment of wraps for new vehicles.
- 3M did not do this in secrecy and had suggested for quite some time that their wrap producing customers look at the same ideas and do something similar themselves.
- 3M's program, as far as I can tell, does not impact vehicles already on the street, used vehicles, new vehicles purchased instead of leased, non-participating dealers, or vehicle buyers choosing to get their wraps done by a provider outside of the dealer's program.
But PLEASE, don't say that there is no difference between the Avery affair and the 3M program.
Fred, obviously Avery had some sort of emotional affect on you. Looks like we're going through something similar. But let me update your information. Original wraps 3M will wrap any vehicle. They're wrap for anyone.. no matter how old, or how new.