Christian @ 2CT Media
Active Member
Its also less material waste, faster loading and unloading, Less after processing, and much less cost to stick with the 570s. You also don't need special equipment to load and unload rolls and 1 operator, once its in pace, can manage multiple machines vs requiring 2 for loading and unloading.You really should be thinking about the big printers. One 3000 is way easier to manage and maintain and needs way less labor than 15 570's. Also the 3000 will need less space . And having 15 HP printers, What a tech nightmare!! That's 90 HP print heads that need to be working good!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1 3200 can produce at this sellable quality roughly 150 linear feet in 1.25hrs x 2 rolls, just 5 570 machines outpace that for less than 1/3rd the cost and is less work space than a 3200 machine. There is also less down time if something should happen and faster recovery if a replacement is needed. And Loading/Unloading time is less than 3 minutes per machine vs 15+ and 2 people on the bigger ones.
This type of job is all about math and the bigger faster machines from HP don't add up for us.
Lets talk about heads for a second too, on this 200 roll job we factored for 4 complete head changes on 2 machines. We ended up with only 1 complete head change on 1 machine. Our heads averaged 35000ml of ink before replacement.... that would be easy peasy to manage on a larger scale.