Earth to Gino, She's not his C U S T O M E R. Also about our legal experiences, apparently, the main difference between you and us is that we have less experience going to court because we know how to avoid getting into a position where we need to go. Going to court to get paid is one thing, Going to court to defend yourself, is something entirely different. You talk about experience, we have had a handful of people threaten to sue us, In the past we have addressed it in two different possible ways: The way you are promoting, which was more trouble than it's worth, then ignoring them after they threaten to sue. Before the threat, sure we might try to figure out a way to patch up the relationship with the client, but after the threat of legal action, every time we have tried to reason with the person it was a huge waste of time. Either way the handful of times someone has threatened to sue us, the majority of the time they never actually did. If they actually did, we get our lawyer involved. When it's your business, we don't leave something like that to chance, we hire a professional.
Earth has nothing to do with it, when you want to find silly loopholes to make the other look bad, you start using emotional stunts. You would've been better off saying Joe to Gino, cause I wasn't talking about Earth in any regards. I realize the lady isn't his customer, but she did threaten him and in the filed he makes his living. She threatened his reputation and workmanship. That constitutes a confrontation. Understand this Joe, confrontation does not mean you have to butt heads and have a cat fight with the lady. It can also mean
meeting of persons face to face, a
n open conflict of opposing ideas, forces, etc. or
a bringing together of ideas, themes, etc., for comparison. It's you who is being narrow minded about words, now. Also, another area you are falling short on is defending one's self or accusing another in court, no matter what level of a court you are in. As you must've forgotten already, I said I would/will take a deadbeat to court in a New York second for various reasons, but getting the second half of payment for whatever reason they concocted not to pay is the main one. When they deny things in court, you are required to defend yourself against their accusations.
Joe, you stated your parents business has gone to court for bad pay from a customer. Same here. However,
they usually have some stoopid story as to why they shouldn't have to pay and that's where the
paper trail, before and after pictures and an outlined written letter explaining the entire episode will help you win your case and needing a lawyer for that is generally a gross waste of money. The only reason one needs attorneys are when you don't know how to handle or conduct yourself in a court of law, or you feel the outcome needs help from your end.
If you think what I suggested is wrong, that's your prerogative. However, to tell others what I'm saying is wrong and it's better to hide behind apron strings or just ignore a problem, that's not only childish, it's outright foolish. Also, if someone threatened to sue you and you don't discuss it first with them, why are you still gonna just ignore them ?? If this method has been working for you as you proclaimed, then I must presume you are used to ignoring threats of being sued and non-payment and just hoped for the best. Perhaps this is why this comes quickly to mind for you ?? Kinda like at church where after offering, the usher throws all the money in the offering plate up in the air and whatever God catches is His and whatever falls on the floor is the ushers, huh ??
If you noticed, I said I have another lawyer for personal. In civil matters and other incidents.....
THEN an attorney is 100% necessary, but not in black & white contracts between two little companies.