Search results

:goodpost:

Didn't you read the rules at joining the forum? Now this comment makes one wonder if you purchased all the software you have or did you get illegal copies:rolleyes:

Someone has finally stumped Tiki?

Font sharing is not allowed on this forum! see the rules!

Looks good! Now will you be up in the sleigh?

I and many others will disagree with you! What printer do you have?

Keepers of the Craft!

Try outwater

:goodpost:

How does this help someone in NV?

No it's called kerning:)

What work are you going to put in this portfilio? Is it all your own?

It looks like blown pixels, and the only way to fix it i replace the fead.

Link no workie!

Why do you think churchs have so much money? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most likely because everything they want they want on the cheap but the best!

GiGi seemed to put a big smile on your face:{)-

Thank you Sir!

So Tony you are saying if printed at 300x300 and adjusting -3 it is printing the image locations -.009" approximately, if 300x600 and adjusting the same -3 the image location is -.005" approximately? Is this correct because the on I did seemed to be more that those amounts but the -3 made it fine.

I would like to know why Gerber doesn't say anything about the amount it moves other than pixels. I would think they would know roughly how much the adjustment is in 300x300 and 300x600! Or you would have possibly have done it Fred:)

Well today was the first time I needed to use Rexfixer, and it worked great! Now I would like to know if anyone has calculated how far the pixel movement is in this? I will need to measure how far off it was, I know I set it to -3 and was printing at 300x600 and it corrected it just about...