Gino
Premium Subscriber
Thank you Clarence Darrow. Are you unable to comprehend that the various codes you cite for this village are in direct conflict with the case law cited in the previous post, #78, by Printhog? Do you fail to understand the merely because the tribal elders in this rustic backwater make some rules does not mean that they are constitutional. Which clearly they are not? They are null and void.
Try to follow along, as hard for you as that might be. The rules you cite are based solely on content. This is precisely what they cannot be based on by order of the supreme law of the land as interpreted by the supreme authority on the supreme law of the land. If you cannot follow along here, engage the services of an elementary school child to explain to you the more difficult passages.
So, with this point of view, does this also mean, they can no longer dictate the size of my freedom of speech ?? Perhaps, not even the content ?? Not even the colors or combinations, regardless of being in an historical area or residential or industrial ??
So, if I wanna slap some dumb passage of nonsense, I can just willy-nilly it anywhere I see fit without any worry of setbacks, heights or any other laws on the books ?? I mean, if these laws stifle my freedom, I should be able to do whatever I want, huh ??