theskipman_98
New Member
I wanna be this good when I grow up )
I totally went at this the wrong way. Seeing these other entries surely enlightened me to period work of this type. I learned some good lessons on this one. Nice work guys.
That's why design off #5 should be detailed drawings,with hand drawn neon,transformer size(clearly,it's a lot of footage to pull) side views,elevation, with schematics to prove it can be done in the real worldThey are all nice... and many were tieing for first in my mind...
..one thing that cost a few of the better ones from getting my vote, is that the don't seem to take into account that this clearly is a 2 sided sign. Even #6 where the single feature to cross outside of the panel, is the the ascender of one of the d's... and it is almost perfectly centered... but not quite, and not symetrical on top.
#10 is also a great looking sign, but a backwards "R" sticking out the other side is a tough issue to work around, even if they did want the backwards triangle feature on the other side.
I totally disagree. This layout screams "diner" without actually screaming "diner". There's no ego involved. Rather, a good design shouldn't have to point out the obvious. In reality, the #6 layout could have been completed with greeking in place of "Eddie's Diner" and most people would probably understand that it is a diner sign.#6 fits the mood, but it is a Diner.. ego getting in the way of that layout. Eddie's as the main copy makes you wonder what it is
That's why design off #5 should be detailed drawings,with hand drawn neon,transformer size(clearly,it's a lot of footage to pull) side views,elevation, with schematics to prove it can be done in the real world