"Piracy is illegal. Cracked software is stealing, period (old or new). " Not true. A sign maker has a legit copy of CasMate Pro. He wants to install it on his new computer that has Win XP Pro for an OS. His new computer does not have a comm port or a LPT port for the dongle and CasMate no longer services the software. I cracked CasMate Pro for him and installed it onto his laptop so he can use it without the dongle and use it with Windows XP Pro. What exactly has been stolen and from whom was it stolen?
As for my car comparison...the car represents the software and the car parts represents the dongle. So if a car part fails to work or is lost it would not and is not unreasonable to ask the car dealer for a new part. If the dealer no longer services or stocks the parts then it is not unreasonable for the car owner to buy or find after market parts to fix the car. BTW....only an idiot would ever think of asking a dealer to replace the whole car if it were stolen........or lost.
And just so you know, when you go on line to down load a patch or update you copy of flexi they know if your copy is legit and they know your key codes and registation numbers. I have written a number of software programs and my software ,like win 95 even tells me how many time my software program has been reinstalled. I personally believe that when a software company stops servicing and supporting the software program that a person buys from them then what ever agreement that was between the buyer and seller is no longer enforceable. I don't believe the buyer should be at the mercy of the software seller and be forced to up grade or buy new software because the seller decieded that they will no longer service or support what the buyer bought from them.
Determining the legality of an EULA is way beyond me, but most software companies do list "cracked" software (or using cracked software) as prohibited. Just because you don't like it or have found a way around it doesn't mean it isn't illegal. What was stolen? Realistically? The ability or opportunity to sell a newer version of the product that is supported. Like it or not, that is the world we live in. I am not agreeing with it, just making an argument with some legal footing.
In my world, I am permitted to sell and install
LEGAL versions of the Microsoft Windows operating system on computer hardware. I am not, however, permitted to install "cracked" or "altered" versions of the software under any circumstance (even if I provide a legal license key).
In the circumstance you listed, I can see how one could find it morally acceptable, but not legally permitted. There is a difference.
I did understand your car analogy, but I was twisting it a bit to make a point. The OP was basically wanting to go back to the dealer because his car was lost or stolen.
I don't think that anyone is an idiot here. I just believe that sometimes it is hard to differentiate between morally and legally prohibited. I have seen the folks at SAi make many concessions in the attempt to satisfy a customer, but the software company has to draw a line somewhere and it seems that the lack of availability of the hardware dongle limited their options.
You are correct, if you called them, they would know. But right now, I can download a full version of Flexi 10 from the website without calling anyone. I can also download the update installers without touching the phone. In addition, if you are OK with using cracked software, it would stand to reason that you are OK with using cracked updates to that same software.
It is just hard for me to justify the use of cracked or pirated software, legally or morally.