GypsyGraphics
New Member
OH THIS SHOULD BE GOOD!!! 
-
I want to thank all the members that have upgraded your accounts. I truly appreciate your support of the site monetarily. Supporting the site keeps this site up and running as a lot of work daily goes on behind the scenes. Click to Support Signs101 ...
Hall of Fame threads
- Thread starter Pat Whatley
- Start date
Gino
Premium Subscriber
Fred, before you do this, maybe you should think about selling the rights for making movies and comedy skits out of this stuff. There's some really good material in there.
If you wanna really want to make something big.... show the OC and BoD stuff. That was some really wild chit, too. :ROFLMAO:
If you wanna really want to make something big.... show the OC and BoD stuff. That was some really wild chit, too. :ROFLMAO:
No, tell me I didn't start that, again............... 
Pat Whatley
New Member
...or embarrassing.OH THIS SHOULD BE GOOD!!!
Pat Whatley
New Member
If you wanna really want to make something big.... show the OC and BoD stuff. That was some really wild chit, too. :ROFLMAO:
No, tell me I didn't start that, again...............
Thanks. I had mentally blocked that out until just now.
Msrae
Rae
Dang, apparently I don't have sufficient rights to view this page
But this sounds like a great idea
Flame
New Member
Thanks Rick
Can't say I want to bring up some...um, uncomfortable moments here but eh, if it's good entertainment guess it's ok lol.
CheapVehicleWrap
New Member
i meant everyone except you :Big Laugh
Me too???
Dave Drane
New Member
The Darlak saga
Vinylman
New Member
One problem I can foresee, is someone coming to a thread that was formerly locked down and NOT realizing the background behind the re-posting of said thread.
New comments and allegations begin to fly, old wounds we thought where healed surface, ...
Could become just as contentious as what caused it to be closed in the first place.
Fred; please set up guidelines [which I and others will most likely not read] so that it can be entertaining without causing further harm to the readers or those mentioned in the closed threads to be harmed.
EXAMPLE:
What if someone[anyone] had a serious drinking problem in their past. A few people in the community where aware of this persons FORMER BEHAVIOR, but the person had turned their life around some time in the recent past.
Along comes a new neighbor into the community, [after the transformation of the former transgressor] what should be the point of view of the new neighbor toward the former drinker [problem maker, NOW REFORMED] ?
If the new neighbor has no knowledge of the former drinkers transgressions, [ and assuming they are no longer causing ANY PROBLEMS for current neighbors, and current neighbors have forgiven the earlier transgressions] would it serve any positive good to perhaps poison the new neighbors point of reference for future interaction with the FORMER trouble maker?
All of us can have our point of view of other people and situations altered if only slightly by negative or false information. It happens every day. Perhaps erring on the side of caution can prevent that from happening here BEFORE it starts a firestorm.
Just something to ponder!
New comments and allegations begin to fly, old wounds we thought where healed surface, ...
Could become just as contentious as what caused it to be closed in the first place.
Fred; please set up guidelines [which I and others will most likely not read] so that it can be entertaining without causing further harm to the readers or those mentioned in the closed threads to be harmed.
EXAMPLE:
What if someone[anyone] had a serious drinking problem in their past. A few people in the community where aware of this persons FORMER BEHAVIOR, but the person had turned their life around some time in the recent past.
Along comes a new neighbor into the community, [after the transformation of the former transgressor] what should be the point of view of the new neighbor toward the former drinker [problem maker, NOW REFORMED] ?
If the new neighbor has no knowledge of the former drinkers transgressions, [ and assuming they are no longer causing ANY PROBLEMS for current neighbors, and current neighbors have forgiven the earlier transgressions] would it serve any positive good to perhaps poison the new neighbors point of reference for future interaction with the FORMER trouble maker?
All of us can have our point of view of other people and situations altered if only slightly by negative or false information. It happens every day. Perhaps erring on the side of caution can prevent that from happening here BEFORE it starts a firestorm.
Just something to ponder!
iSign
New Member
here's a classic n00b bashing thread..
and a VERY famous banning thread
(both with some classic Flame-as-n00bie posts ...sorry bro, the nature of the net lives on)
and a VERY famous banning thread
(both with some classic Flame-as-n00bie posts ...sorry bro, the nature of the net lives on)
iSign
New Member
what? ...did you quit drinking or something bob? you haven't pissed me off in at least a few years I don't think :Big Laugh (I didn't quit.. but I don't think I've pissed you off lately either... aw, maybe we've just been busy
)guidelines??
god forbid...
I don't think anyone intended on "unlocking' any locked threads... just filing them in the same drawer....
iSign
New Member
this may or may not qualify as a highlight of entertainment... but certainly an historic moment for me, and for this site, in my opinion..
(and the other one that led to the thread mentioned above)
(and the other one that led to the thread mentioned above)
Last edited:
Pat Whatley
New Member
The sheer curiosity of what is in these links is going to make me pony up my $50 so I can access them.