Joe Diaz
New Member
Besides the logo looking bad on the 2nd one. The 2nd design is much better. It is clean easy to read and get the message across. The first design looked cluttered, busy and had way too much white space.
Just cause you slapped a garbage background on a van doesn't make it a good design.
I disagree. I think the first design was on the right track. Yes it needed some work, but the OP admitted that it was just a first draft.
"get's the message across"??? you mean all 30 of them?:Big Laugh I disagree. There is way too much content on the 2nd design and too much to read. All of that content is competing for attention, and none of those elements are coming out the winner. At least the first layout had the logo and a phone number. It didn't come off looking like a newspaper ad. Selling some special that I already forgot about as I'm type this or displaying a laundry list of services that I have also already forgot about, shouldn't be the primary goal of an ad like this. It should be brand recognition. All the effort of a project like this should be trying to figure out a way to say the most by really saying the least. Some fine tuning on the background graphic and the first layout would have been a much more effective design than what they ended up with. But ideally I would beg them to redesign their logo and take a good look at their overall branding strategy. However I realize that is easier said than done.