SignProPlus-Chip
New Member
I was reading this article:
http://southtownstar.suntimes.com/n...l-officials-are-no-fans-of-gun-ban-signs.html
The gist is that some people are so hoplophobic they can't even bear the sight of a gun, on a "No Guns Allowed" sign.
I think most of the easy to read hieroglyphic style signs we use daily for this like "men's room" "no smoking" etc...are easy to understand, not matter your language. They are so basic, I just don't think anything else would be as effective.
So, since one of the people in the article suggested designing a logo to use instead of the standard black silhouette with a red cross through it to designate "No Guns Allowed"....I thought it would make an excellent design challenge to see if anyone here could come up with something as universally understood as the existing sign.
I for one am at a loss, and I will declare my bias by stating that I think some of these folks are a little "off"
http://southtownstar.suntimes.com/n...l-officials-are-no-fans-of-gun-ban-signs.html
The gist is that some people are so hoplophobic they can't even bear the sight of a gun, on a "No Guns Allowed" sign.
I think most of the easy to read hieroglyphic style signs we use daily for this like "men's room" "no smoking" etc...are easy to understand, not matter your language. They are so basic, I just don't think anything else would be as effective.
So, since one of the people in the article suggested designing a logo to use instead of the standard black silhouette with a red cross through it to designate "No Guns Allowed"....I thought it would make an excellent design challenge to see if anyone here could come up with something as universally understood as the existing sign.
I for one am at a loss, and I will declare my bias by stating that I think some of these folks are a little "off"