Texas_Signmaker
Very Active Signmaker
Oopps it was a dud... but still effective.
Haha I saw that. Shaking my head for a second time nowOh no!!! The bomb DID go off. "Act quickly", call in the "Flying Water Tanker"
I have nothing else to do till 3pm...
Haha I saw that. Shaking my head for a second time now
The New Deal was a socialist economic stimulus package. Without it, we wouldn't have been prepared to help during WWII and certainly would not have been in a position to prosper after WWII.
Tax brackets over history: https://taxfoundation.org/us-federa...2013-nominal-and-inflation-adjusted-brackets/
Reagan got rid of the FCC Fairness doctrine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_fairness_doctrine
Union Membership's decline and the relationship to wages: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Union_membership_in_us_1930-2010.png
Wealth disparity Information: https://apps.urban.org/features/wealth-inequality-charts/
Healthcare Costs Over Time: https://www.healthsystemtracker.org...stantially-over-the-past-several-decades_2017
Simply put, there's a reason why people are upset by the situation.
The New Deal was a socialist economic stimulus package. Without it, we wouldn't have been prepared to help during WWII and certainly would not have been in a position to prosper after WWII.
Tax brackets over history: https://taxfoundation.org/us-federa...2013-nominal-and-inflation-adjusted-brackets/
Reagan got rid of the FCC Fairness doctrine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_fairness_doctrine
Union Membership's decline and the relationship to wages: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Union_membership_in_us_1930-2010.png
Wealth disparity Information: https://apps.urban.org/features/wealth-inequality-charts/
Healthcare Costs Over Time: https://www.healthsystemtracker.org...stantially-over-the-past-several-decades_2017
Simply put, there's a reason why people are upset by the situation.
Its after a certain pointWTF??? Did we really have a 94% tax rate in 1945? That can't be right.
We did but only on a class of people making what would be in today's dollars millions a day. It also led to the generation of the un-tied corporate entity and the ability reclassify income.WTF??? Did we really have a 94% tax rate in 1945? That can't be right.
Its after a certain point
We did but only on a class of people making what would be in today's dollars millions a day. It also led to the generation of the un-tied corporate entity and the ability reclassify income.
But the target was for the corporate entities like Chase, Boeing, etc who were capitalizing on the war efforts. It was also a turning point in which "CEOs" could disassociate themselves from all the profits by reclassifying incomes similar to today's tax system.Well, not "millions a day" It was for people over 200k which today would be 2.8 million. Good chunk of change... and even more so back then. Interesting though
But the target was for the corporate entities like Chase, Boeing, etc who were capitalizing on the war efforts. It was also a turning point in which "CEOs" could disassociate themselves from all the profits by reclassifying incomes similar to today's tax system.
I couldn't agree more... But alas people on both sides would complain that their 10% is worth more than someone elses 10%.Seems a flat tax would solve a lot of the mess that goes on today.
I couldn't agree more... But alas people on both sides would complain that their 10% is worth more than someone elses 10%.
I think with the flat tax it should scale up through 200% of the poverty threshold and then cap with no deductions. For the Corporate tax rate it should be a scaled tax with no deductions, scaled based on net income tiers and those funds can't be taxed twice once passed through to personal income through capital gains.