Geneva Olson
Expert Storyteller
Well, 1 - there was no opsec violation (no vital information about the mission was given in the texts)So, What'd ya think? especially now that they released the full chat convo.... It seems to me that the information was "classified".. or should be classified by default since it was an upcoming strike.
Just watched the white House press secretary say it's all a smear campaign because the reporters a registered Democrat... And that nothing in the chat was classified, because hegseth says so... so it's not a big deal.
Seems like a major screw up to me, most press will publish anything asap to get the scoop on the story, if this guy published an article that he got word an attack would be happening in 30 mins.... It coulda (would have) put a lot of soldiers lives in jeopardy, or at best put the Yemen people on alert and ruin the mission.
I think it's just as bad that the journalist stuck around and didn't point out he was in the group convo that contained such information... And only pointed it out after it was over...
It'll be interesting to see who invited Goldberg and why though. I don't see why hegseth would have Goldberg's number in his phone to even accidently invite him, something seems fishy!
2 - the mission was already completed and a success after the "leak" happened
3 - the real question is how did the journalist get into the group chat?
4 - there's a new theory out there: this was a way to flush out the more deep state marauders...and it worked. there's actually information on the answer to my 3rd question.