Johnny Best
Active Member
Which one do we like best?
you sound like the customer who bought his wife along for the decision making.
Which one do we like best?
I just point the vehicle north-south during delivery and then tell the customer I used meridian lines to set the level.
Most don't know what they are but won't admit it to a lowly sign guy so they give me the thumbs up & drive off.
How accurate is using a level like that? Is it better then eyeballing? My thing is, if ya cant eyeball it you probably shouldn't be applying graphics.
I always have a drawing showing how the graphic will situate on the truck. If the client signs off on it, I am good to go. I don't ask them to decide, but if they bring it up I explain my reasoning.
I use a level, but only after I have established a horizontal reference point. It has an adjustable vial so I can match the slope of the established horizontal reference and transfer that angled line to the rest of the truck. In that way, my graphics can be lined up to the same horizontal reference. Especially for text and geometric shapes, I find if there is an internal logic between the seperate elements it looks better. One thing that bugs me on a lot of installs is text set at different angles (unless it was designed to be that way).
View attachment 144655
Great demonstration! It is easy to see that version B has the best harmony with the vehicle. The text lines up with the bottom of the vehicle, the lower trim molding, and the bottom of the window. Version C just looks like somebody just stuck it on by eye - it is a compromise and just looks amateurish. Version A is just a stupid mistake.
I only use a level for internal consistency if I have seperate elements that must be installed. If I have a one piece graphic, I try to find the "effective" horizontal (sort of like a horizontal "vector" that is informed by all the horizontal elements of the vehicle, including its stance).I've never used a level. I place it around the area that needs the info, step back at least 15-20 ft. and make that decision from there. If tires are low at one end or contour of vehicles all can contribute to being leveled. JMO Not saying this is the best way, but it's worked so far...
.You "anti-level" guys are pretty adamant. 1000%? You should really try it!
It is a bad idea, however, to establish a reference horizontal using a level (for all the reasons the "anti-level" crowd have explained). I only use one (an adjustable level) after I have established a reference horizontal by sight, and want to create a consistent layout with usually seperate lines of text and/or geometric graphics. Without a level (adjustable preferred), it can be difficult to get all the elements to line up with each other. You can easily end up with lines of text that are at different angles to each other, which will often compromise the impact of the overall design.
You "anti-level" guys are pretty adamant. 1000%? You should really try it!
It is a bad idea, however, to establish a reference horizontal using a level (for all the reasons the "anti-level" crowd have explained). I only use one (an adjustable level) after I have established a reference horizontal by sight, and want to create a consistent layout with usually seperate lines of text and/or geometric graphics. Without a level (adjustable preferred), it can be difficult to get all the elements to line up with each other. You can easily end up with lines of text that are at different angles to each other, which will often compromise the impact of the overall design.
If I'm reading this right, what you are saying is you don't use a level to put graphics on a van to true level. You establish what is the best looking angle to be the horizontal element according to the lines and rake of the van, and then use a tool to keep it consistent.