I hope I'm replying to this correctly
Thanks for your input - I did try to work around the concept - but didn't feel I
I made it different enough to feel good about calling it mine. It would be easy to pass off the "new" and improved look to someone who has never seen it before but when they're side by side you know it's a copy. So...I will either eliminate the bird or get someone to create it for me. This discussion made me think a lot about my business identity in general - I'm not sure what I'm trying to create for myself can even be called a logo - I don't expect to ever go Global - not looking to create a corporate identity package that is recognized world wide - really just want a way to be identified locally - and hopefully be happy making a decent living.
thanks again
Let me start by saying I am a publisher of clip art. I firmly believe that one should NEVER use clip art as part of a logo or any other work in which you would want to claim all rights. there is no such things as modifying it enough to "make it yours". That is a myth because the outcome it is still a derivative of the original and forbidden by 999 out of 1,000 licenses.
What you can and should do is to use an image you think would work for you as an inspiration. And then sit down and draw something (or hire someone to draw it) based on that inspiration.
Just because you have only local ambitions isn't a reason to shrug off the advice I'm giving. Let me relate a true story ...
A few years ago we did a lot of work for a new customer named Cousin Vinny's Italian Buffet. He provided us with a CD containing his corporate identity that he had proudly paid the "designer" $3,000 for. Here's what he got for his money:
A couple of months after he opened, I noticed a night club sign (that changes hands two or three times a year) that I drive by everyday to work had changed hands again. This time it was called The Rendezvous and there was the same image of the guy in the same oval ... except this time he had a cigarette in his mouth.
I phoned Vinny when I got to work to see if he needed anything for his new venture. He knew nothing about it and had no connection with it.
His restaurant was located less than two miles from the new night club. The conclusion I had jumped to was an easy one to make and Vinny tried to assert his rights. What he quickly found out was that neither he nor the night club had any rights to their "logos" and any confusion that might result was theirs to bear.
The "designer" could not be found.