With all due respect Fred, you should take another look at the image this site is portraying. The name of the site itself seems to indicate that this is a site for those new to the industry. I'm completely sure you realize that "101" is a classification for entry level college classes. Why then would you be so surprised that newbies come here looking for information and advice? Why is it necessary for you to lead by example and make a mockery of the guy in the thread? By doing that, you have just stamped your seal of approval on the very behavior that you and your mods hand out "infactions" for.
To those of your who are business owners or managers, if you have an issue to discuss with one of your employees, you would let him have it in front of everyone else in the shop? Or would you handle it like a professional and take them into a private office? This is really not that different.
I would think by now, if you really get as many bogus members as you say you do, that you would have a simple copy+paste form letter that you email out when you cancel an unqualified membership. Work smarter not harder.
First off, I didn't name this site. At the time I "inherited" it, most of the 400 members disappeared because all that it was being used for was file swapping. The founder, BTW, never mentioned that he had run up some advertising bills with the trade magazines that he had no intention of paying. In those days, Signs 101 was a virtual ghost town. So I led by example and engaged in open discussions with those who still came around. Much of the advice they gave then and continued, along with others, contributed heavily into the evolved version that exists today.
The name, however, remained because it does fit the mission of the site and the community. And just as you said:
I'm completely sure you realize that "101" is a classification for entry level college classes. Why then would you be so surprised that newbies come here looking for information and advice?
that is true. Our mission is to help all members who wish to earn all or part of their livings making signs and other graphic products. What isn't true is that this same information and advice should be freely handed out to individuals who have no interest in producing signs for others in return for payment. You seem to equate legitimate newbies with any information seeker that visits here. I don't and neither do the primary contributors of information and help at Signs 101. We do seek to limit to the greatest extent possible the useful information available to non-professionals who come here seeking it.
As to perception, if I based my conduct on worrying about your perception or that of others who may well be guilty of "just not getting it", I would just close the doors here. You and others who like to take me to task for my decisions and choices do so with no clue of the many things that do go on in private and just how infuriating and counter productive such casually given generalized judgments are.
And how many infractions do you think we give out? Or, after nine years, how many members have been banned? Let me enlighten you:
Since 2003, the total number of infractions issued here can be counted on one's fingers and toes with a foot full of toes and then some left unused. But on a daily basis, there are around 15 to 20 things that happen here that end up being moderated in some way. In nearly every case, the member is sent a PM explaining what was done and why.
Since 2003, we have banned less members here than were banned at Signs 201 in the first four weeks of its existence.
The total number of threads in which a new member is accused of not meeting our membership criteria and/or is treated rudely is a minuscule percentage of the responses and treatment of new members as a whole. And, in the majority of cases, the members accusing and/or being rude are correct in their perceptions.
We currently process between 20 and 30 new member registrations a day. They are screened and extra time is spent in verifying the truthfulness of their statements. Each receives an email from me as to the outcome of their application. Among those that are rejected, some reply with some of the nastiest filth and bad manners you could imagine. In short, I spend a major part of my day playing gatekeeper and moderator in an effort to keep Signs 101 the success it has evolved into and continuing to meet its mission to help professionals in the business be better at what they do and more profitable as well.
My confronting and questioning the OP had everything to do with my role as gatekeeper here. I chose to do so in public to make the same point to hundreds of other non-professionals at the same time and to make clear to existing members that there is a continuing effort to live up to the mission that was agreed to a couple of years back by several hundred of our most active and helpful members.
In closing, your criticisms, suggestions and observations are incorrect, based on not having enough information, invalid, confused and insulting. Your perception of what you think Signs 101 is and/or should be are your own and not shared by me or by most of our members.