Anyone having any luck signing on to your states health care exchange?
I have been trying all day and can't get on New York's site...
Why do "we" need it. You do not need the change because you work for a living. But a big part of Americans (15%) do not have any health care. So doctors, hospitals, insurance companies and politicians will reap money from the federal government by taking over the health care system. It will also secure a large voting block of people who will vote democratic because of being fearful free things will be taken away from them. Cisco just laid off 5,000 people today because of this bill.I don't care....... why do we need it ?? I still have yet to find someone who can explain this and not just hem and haw and say things that make no sense whatsoever.
Like Tech, my rates are moving like crazy. My agent just told me to hang tight until this thing blows over, then she will go to work for me again. Sad thing is..... I just renewed a few months back and now they're gonna go up again, but with no rhyme or reason as to why..... other than..... it JUST can.
Wow, that is news, so I looked it up, seems back in August Cisco announced ut will be laying off 5000 employees in 2014 due to the "slow economy" which resulte in their earning of only $2.23 billion in the last quarter. So unless there's a new story today that doesn't appear in a Google search the layoffs have nothing to do with health insurance.Cisco just laid off 5,000 people today because of this bill.
Wow, that is news, so I looked it up, seems back in August Cisco announced ut will be laying off 5000 employees in 2014 due to the "slow economy" which resulte in their earning of only $2.23 billion in the last quarter. So unless there's a new story today that doesn't appear in a Google search the layoffs have nothing to do with health insurance.
http://www.businessinsider.com/cisco-will-lay-off-4000-people-next-year-2013-8
Wow, that is news, so I looked it up, seems back in August Cisco announced ut will be laying off 5000 employees in 2014 due to the "slow economy" which resulte in their earning of only $2.23 billion in the last quarter. So unless there's a new story today that doesn't appear in a Google search the layoffs have nothing to do with health insurance.
http://www.businessinsider.com/cisco-will-lay-off-4000-people-next-year-2013-8
You are in one of the highest states for health care costs. You do get federal tax deductions for that, but, you live in a state with state income tax. My best advice to you is to stay healthy and cut back on the buffalo wings, beef on wick and beer.last year I paid $7284 for the year and my deductible was $11,000....
yes, $11,000
yes, i said $11,000
so, i want to check it out and see if i'm going to stop paying for everyone else and get myself a break....
Wow, that is news, so I looked it up, seems back in August Cisco announced ut will be laying off 5000 employees in 2014 due to the "slow economy" which resulte in their earning of only $2.23 billion in the last quarter. So unless there's a new story today that doesn't appear in a Google search the layoffs have nothing to do with health insurance.
http://www.businessinsider.com/cisco-will-lay-off-4000-people-next-year-2013-8
This deadline has been known for a while. It would be very easy to say one thing in order to not have to deal with public opinion repercussions. Far easier to blame slow economy and not have to worry about having to pay extra for health benefits for employees. It may be true, but how easy it is for people to skirt around the truth nowadays, I have a hard time thinking of that at face value.
A lot of companies are playing around with hours etc of their employees to mitigate what they have to shell out for.
As the article I cited said, Cisco made a couple billion dollars in the last quarter, maybe they could use some of that, and did John say the CEO just got his salry doubled? How many tens of million dollars was that?This whole debacle is costing them well into the tens of millions of dollars. Where will that suddenly new cost come from ??
If you own Cisco stock, you would know it has grown seven fold under John Chambers leadership. He deserves the money he is making. If there was an leader in office as the president and he had business sense to made a profit for the US government, I would applaud him. It is not greed, it is business, they have to lay off to keep cost down and things are being outsourced and automated all the time. And government taxing to pay for the havenots who are unwilling to work or not qualified is where the business has to take care of what they have so all is not lost. Greed Sir, is rooted in politics, always has been and always will be.As the article I cited said, Cisco made a couple billion dollars in the last quarter, maybe they could use some of that, and did John say the CEO just got his salry doubled? How many tens of million dollars was that?
And I'm not being political, this is about greed, there was a time when a company could take care of theri employees and still make a boatload of money, it just didn't have to be a boat as big as the Titanic.
As the article I cited said, Cisco made a couple billion dollars in the last quarter, maybe they could use some of that, and did John say the CEO just got his salry doubled? How many tens of million dollars was that?
And I'm not being political, this is about greed, there was a time when a company could take care of theri employees and still make a boatload of money, it just didn't have to be a boat as big as the Titanic.