jiarby
New Member
I do not think the boss's comment was out of line... The guys fubar'd it the first day. Then was late again the second day, even after knowing he was not sure where it was.
I do not think it is condescending or rude. He DID have 24hrs to find the place. He was extremely fortunate that they gave him a second chance. His lame excuse "Sorry, I couldn't find the place" worked the 1st day, but on the second day it has to sound like BS to the boss.
If the applicant can't take criticism from his boss then he should go work for himself.
I think we see your true colors here... For some reason you seem jaded and frustrated about working for someone else.
The owner/employee relationship should be a two way street... but not exactly like I think you mean it. The worker is NOT an equal partner. The owner's lane on that street is much wider, and the employee's lane might be better described as a bike path.
It does not matter that the owner cannot do what you do... that is WHY they hired you to begin with. The employee can't do what the owner does either...
The owner invested the money to start the business. He is the one bearing all the risk.. He owns all the equipment and supplies. He gets to decide how, when, where, and why things get done.
The owner DOES need happy productive employees... and gets them by providing a fair wage and good work environment. Even so, the employee exists solely for the benefit of the employer.
If you do not like it then quit and start your own business. No one is stopping you. Then YOU can be the boss.
Oh yeah, see how you like it when you want to hire someone and they can't even figure out how to show up for an interview... TWICE!!
Sometimes a boss has to be the boss when an employee is not getting it done... If the employee thinks that is rude and condescending... it's OK with me.
The employee's job is to pull the oars that drive the ship. The Boss's job is to decide how to get the ship from one place to another on time and under budget without damaging the cargo or the ship. The owner's job is to provide the ship, pay the crew, and book the freight so everyone gets paid. If he manages all those things well then he prospers, if not hegoes bankrupt. He is responsible for everything and bears all the risk. If the ship is late and the cargo rots the oarsman still expects to get paid while the owner is bleeding in losses.
If you get a job interview to be an oarsman just be sure you do not show 5 minutes after the boat leaves the dock.
And if you do, expect to get some ribbing from the captain.
Stating "you had 24 hours to find us" is both condescending and rude.
I do not think it is condescending or rude. He DID have 24hrs to find the place. He was extremely fortunate that they gave him a second chance. His lame excuse "Sorry, I couldn't find the place" worked the 1st day, but on the second day it has to sound like BS to the boss.
If the applicant can't take criticism from his boss then he should go work for himself.
Employers always seem to think they are the GODS and potential prospects need to bow to them for employment, albeit 10-12-15 bucks an hour. Big deal.
The whole hiring process and employee/employer interaction should be a two way street. But many that OWN the company, who usually Can't DO the work ...... have god complex's ... most know exactly what I am saying, they have lived it.
I think we see your true colors here... For some reason you seem jaded and frustrated about working for someone else.
The owner/employee relationship should be a two way street... but not exactly like I think you mean it. The worker is NOT an equal partner. The owner's lane on that street is much wider, and the employee's lane might be better described as a bike path.
It does not matter that the owner cannot do what you do... that is WHY they hired you to begin with. The employee can't do what the owner does either...
The owner invested the money to start the business. He is the one bearing all the risk.. He owns all the equipment and supplies. He gets to decide how, when, where, and why things get done.
The owner DOES need happy productive employees... and gets them by providing a fair wage and good work environment. Even so, the employee exists solely for the benefit of the employer.
If you do not like it then quit and start your own business. No one is stopping you. Then YOU can be the boss.
Oh yeah, see how you like it when you want to hire someone and they can't even figure out how to show up for an interview... TWICE!!
Sometimes a boss has to be the boss when an employee is not getting it done... If the employee thinks that is rude and condescending... it's OK with me.
The employee's job is to pull the oars that drive the ship. The Boss's job is to decide how to get the ship from one place to another on time and under budget without damaging the cargo or the ship. The owner's job is to provide the ship, pay the crew, and book the freight so everyone gets paid. If he manages all those things well then he prospers, if not hegoes bankrupt. He is responsible for everything and bears all the risk. If the ship is late and the cargo rots the oarsman still expects to get paid while the owner is bleeding in losses.
If you get a job interview to be an oarsman just be sure you do not show 5 minutes after the boat leaves the dock.
And if you do, expect to get some ribbing from the captain.