I want to thank all the members that have upgraded your accounts. I truly appreciate your support of the site monetarily. Supporting the site keeps this site up and running as a lot of work daily goes on behind the scenes.
Click to Support Signs101 ...
Phone no. has to go, regardless of what you do. It's unnecessary and it's killing your layouts. Too much information. Who. What. Where. That's it. That's the list. And you don't need Where on this one.
EDIT: I think my solution will be an extra pair of hands to help with the liner. I tried a 4' x 4' piece by myself while ago and the only place I got bubbles was where I stopped squeegeeing for a second.
Kraig, what kind of tips do you have for products with thin backer? I'm trying to cover entire 4x8 sheets of dibond with Oracal 721. Not sure if it has the thin backer like you say 210 lam does but it's giving me fits.
I've read other threads that suggest using one hand on the liner and one...
I traced your image and submitted it at whatfontis. Here's a link with 100 fonts it found that are supposed to be close. Not a whole lot of great ones. Hopefully you won't have to be signed in to follow the link.
http://www.whatfontis.com/list-f10823d796f3191522f022afddadff70.html
1. Looks like slightly modified Chelsea Studio or some form of Willow or ITC Willow are your best bets.
2. You could have run it through http://www.whatfontis.com/ just like I did.
Pretty weird. I couldn't tell you the last time I saw somebody use that font (Add City boy) before this week. Now this is the third thread in two days where somebody is trying to use it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.