I was going to start a new thread about this, but thought.... why start still yet another about religion and have it locked down ??
This is not discussing religion, but more of an observance of how someone's thinking spills out onto others and then we're supposed to act rationally, while they don't with simple specific words aimed towards creating arguments.
Anyway, I finally read one of Colin’s links to his beliefs and people he admires and looks up to. Guess what it said real big behind the man’s name ??
“Antagonistic Atheism” Now, I understand.
It’s not enough to be an atheist, but in his world… you must be antagonistic against anyone. This is quite a lot like terrorists wanting all infidels dead regardless of their background. They are all viewed the same. Now, Colin doesn’t want anyone dead, but he can’t help himself from condemning anyone with a religious bone in their body. The other term coming up a lot is “New Atheism”. Seems it is their goal to just argue for the sake of arguing. Not to help or feel for your fellow man, but just to be opposite. Some of these people didn’t get along with others in their families, let alone mainstream people. Extremists, generally don’t do much for a cause no matter what the base root for it is.
I know I'll be flamed, but it's more clear now, why he needs to always have a confrontation... even when its not necessary. He's a follower and has been taught this is how to approach 'others'.